Achieving Interoperability in Digitalised Healthcare in the European Union

Research Stream: Social Technologies

Author: Matthew McKenna, PhD Researcher at Maynooth University’s Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Research Funded through the Science Foundation of Ireland (SFI) Centre for Research Training in Advanced Networks for Sustainable Societies (ADVANCE CRT)

In October 2021, MedTec Europe released a white paper in collaboration with the European Coordination Committee of the Radiological, Electromedical and Healthcare IT Industry (COCIR) titled, ‘Interoperability Standards in Digital Health: A White Paper from the Medical Technology Industry’. It defines interoperability in digital healthcare as “the ability of different information systems, devices and applications (systems) to access, exchange, integrate and cooperatively use data in a coordinated manner, within and across organisational, regional and national boundaries, to provide timely and seamless portability of information and optimise the health of individuals and populations globally”. It also underscores the fundamental importance of interoperability, stating that, “Lack of interoperability is widely acknowledged to be a critical barrier for the adoption and deployment of digital health technologies and for the digital transformation of healthcare”. To this end, interoperability in digital healthcare represents an indispensable systems component and critical necessity for the provision of modern healthcare in the European Union (EU).

To date however, the digitalisation of healthcare in the EU has encountered a complex web of bureaucratic, social and legal challenges due to a fragmented digital health technology market and poor inter-agency cooperation resulting from insufficient interoperability between structures and stakeholders on a national and international level. This has greatly slowed the pace at which potential benefits of digital technology can be translated into tangible improvements in healthcare and quality of life for people in the EU. The European Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Commission’) has arguably been slow to take decisive measures to enhance cross-sectoral coordination by reforming regulatory frameworks governing digital healthcare technologies. As such, data sharing, procurement and administration of digital technologies in the care environment has been governed by customary national laws of individual EU member states. Discordant legal rules and standards across the EU limit the ability of businesses developing and marketing digital health technologies such as robots and connected devices and services to operate effectively in the single market. Deficits of strategic cross-sectoral interoperability in the digitalisation of healthcare infrastructure and a lack of interagency communication and cooperation has discernibly contributed to the longevity of traditional, non-digital and wardship models of care provision, particularly for vulnerable individuals including older people and persons with disabilities.

Perhaps understandably, the Commission has approached the emergence of digital health technologies with a significant degree of apparent caution. In the absence of measures to promote wide-scale uniformity in procurement and implementation processes for connected devices and services in the care environment, the cohesive integration of these modern capabilities represents a slow and costly challenge for a siloed and fragmented European healthcare sector. In its approach to digital health technology, the Commission has assumed an unhurried and deliberate process of supporting research initiatives funded through programmes such as Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe. The logical reasoning here is to assess, trial and identify examples of best practice in digitalisation within the care sector through the professional utility and implementation of digital technologies by clinicians and care workers. In this way, a trial-and-error process through practice and research can be established, with the experiences of the carer playing an important role in determining the practical challenges of ensuring effective implementation of digital health technologies in the care environment.

The digital healthcare technology industry in the EU is splintered and disorganised, even within the context of the single market. The following Commission Communication document from April 2018 titled ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Enabling the Digital Transformation of Health and Care in the Digital Single Market; Empowering Citizens and Building a Healthier Society’, announced the following strategic initiatives:

To date, the uptake of digital solutions for health and care remains slow and varies greatly across Member States and regions. Further action at EU level is crucial to accelerate the meaningful use of digital solutions in public health and healthcare in Europe. In its mid-term review on the implementation of the Digital Single Market (DSM) 2014 – 2019 strategy the Commission set out its intention to take further action in three areas:

  1. citizens’ secure access to their health data, including across borders, enabling citizens to access their health data across the EU;
  2. personalised medicine through shared European data infrastructure, allowing researchers and other professionals to pool resources (data, expertise, computing processing and storage capacities) across the EU;
  3. citizen empowerment with digital tools for user feedback and person-centred care using digital tools to empower people to look after their health, stimulate prevention and enable feedback and interaction between users and healthcare providers” (European Commission, 2018).

To this end, in 2022, the Commission put forward a proposal for a regulatory framework for the sharing of health data within the EU called the ‘European Health Data Space’ (EHDS) (European Union, 2022). According to the Commission, it will function as “a common EU data space for health data that empowers individuals and fosters a single market for electronic health records”. Further to this, “in 2024, the European Parliament and Council reached a political agreement on the Commission Proposal for the EHDS”. The EHDS is an important pillar in the construction of the European Health Union which aims to create a more unified, harmonised and effective healthcare system throughout the EU and to ensure the availability of medical supplies. These measures also address significant aspects of the three areas outlined above in the 2018 Commission Communication on the Digital Transformation of Health and Care.

In April 2024, the Interoperable Europe Act entered into force in the EU, representing an important step towards the harmonisation of “key” public services as part of the broader Digital Decade strategy. However, extending broader strategic digital interoperability across healthcare systems in the EU arguably requires dedicated and sector-specific legislative overhaul. Interoperable digitalised systems that empower caregiver engagement with stakeholders in policymaking and identification of good practice is necessary to facilitate smooth delivery of high standards in modern care. Digitalised interoperable healthcare systems with seamless transmission of patient health data, alongside appropriately scalable, cost-effective and rapid procurement mechanisms in the implementation of digital technology for effective service provision can maximise the efficiency and expertise of an invaluable care workforce.

Although certain long-anticipated initiatives are underway to harmonise digital healthcare systems in the EU through enhanced interoperability and an easing of some inhibitory regulatory barriers to the smooth functioning of health technology companies in the single market, change is happening at an often-lethargic pace. Unfortunately, this puts an unwelcome delay on the latent potential benefits that could be felt by carers and patients at an individual level given the current state of digitalised technological innovation. Furthermore, carers note that interoperability and scalability challenges often become apparent when trialling digital technologies in the care environment. As such, the involvement of healthcare workers in the creation of policy and best practice for the interoperable digitalisation of the care environment is critically important. Caregiver engagement mechanisms in Commission policymaking and communication with industry represent essential components in the development of digital interoperability frameworks that function smoothly and effectively, delivering versatile person-centred digitalised healthcare at an EU-wide level.

Competition Law Enforcement in the EU and Access to Health Technologies: An Overview of the EU 2024 Competition Law Report on Pharmaceuticals and Medical Technologies – Update on Competition Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Sector (2018-2022)

Author: Dr. Opeyemi Kolawole Post-doctoral Researcher, PatentsInHumans Project, ALL Insittute and Department of Law and Crimonology

Research Stream: Social Technologies

Competition law is pivotal in maintaining market equilibrium and safeguarding consumer welfare. In the European Union, competition law principles are enshrined in Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). While Article 101 prohibits the formation and enforcement of agreements that have the object or effect of distorting competition, Article 102 prevents a dominant firm from abusing its dominant market position.

Competition in healthcare services is critical to providing access to affordable medicines and medical technologies, ensuring expensive pharmaceutical and medical technologies do not significantly strain public and private finances. With their proactive enforcement of competition rules, the EU Commission and the 27 National Competition Authorities (NCAs) have been instrumental in this regard. In the recent Report on Competition Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Sector, published in January 2024, the EU Commission provides an overview of how EU competition rules have been enforced to prevent and rectify business practices which may harm competition in the common market and consumer welfare. This article examines some of the key decisions reached by the Commission and some of the NCAs and highlights potential improvement opportunities to maximise consumer welfare.

Continue reading “Competition Law Enforcement in the EU and Access to Health Technologies: An Overview of the EU 2024 Competition Law Report on Pharmaceuticals and Medical Technologies – Update on Competition Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Sector (2018-2022)”

The ERC funded PatentsInHumans Project – Year One Project Report And Reflections!

Research Stream: Social Technologies

Authors: Professor Aisling McMahon, Principal Investigator (ERC PatentsInHumans Project) & Sinéad Masterson, Project Manager (ERC PatentsInHumans Project)

It is hard to believe that the PatentsInHumans Project has passed the one-year point having commenced in November 2022! And what a quick and busy year it was! Alongside recently publishing our Year 1 Report which gave us pause to reflect on the project, we were delighted to write this article for the IDEAS in ALL Blog to mark the first year of the project and to provide a snapshot of the research and other activities the PatentsInHumans team have undertaken during this time.

The PatentsInHumans Project:

Continue reading “The ERC funded PatentsInHumans Project – Year One Project Report And Reflections!”

What Role is There for Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Neurodiversity?

Research Stream: Social Technologies

Author: Emily McConway, Undergraduate Intern in Psychology, Maynooth University and Mac MacLachlan, Professor of Psychology & Social Inclusion, and Co-Director of the ALL Institute, Maynooth University

Early assessment and intervention are vital in facilitating positive developmental and behavioural outcomes for children with neurodevelopmental conditions. Early intervention has a positive long-term effect on both autistic children and their caregivers. The current process of assessing the needs of children with possible autistic traits focuses on the use of behavioural clinical diagnostic instruments such as Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R). Both instruments require direct clinician-to-child observation and can take hours to administer and score. In many countries, long waiting lists, coupled with social, economic and geographic barriers hinders timely assessment of neurodiverse children. The ALL Institute is interested in pragmatic ways to streamline access to services, including assessing a person’s needs for services and supports.   

Continue reading “What Role is There for Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Neurodiversity?”

Equality in a Digital Future? Ensuring Access to Assistive Technology in Third-Level Education

Research Stream: Social Technologies

AuthorMatthew McKenna, PhD Researcher at Maynooth University’s Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute , Research Funded through the Science Foundation of Ireland (SFI) Centre for Research Training in Advanced Networks for Sustainable Societies (ADVANCE CRT)

Supporting universal and consistent access to Assistive Technology (AT) at third-level education within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Ireland represents a critical milestone to achieving equal opportunities for persons with disabilities.

Continue reading “Equality in a Digital Future? Ensuring Access to Assistive Technology in Third-Level Education”

Getting Older Today and Tomorrow: How Should Technology Transform Access to Care and Support Services?

Author: Priscille Geiser is a consultant in rights-based, disability-inclusive development, and a Research Associate with the ALL Institute’s SHAPES project.

Research Stream: Social Technologies

As I visited my grandparents in the north of France earlier this year, I arrived by train at the nearest station and my grandfather, 96 years old, was to proudly drive me home. As he was not there yet, I sent him a text message, and he arrived shortly after. Yet he told me he had not received the message, because he does not know how to use this function.

Continue reading “Getting Older Today and Tomorrow: How Should Technology Transform Access to Care and Support Services?”

A Right to Repair for Medical Devices?

Social Technologies

Author: Dr Opeyemi Kolawole (Post-doctoral Researcher, PatentInHuman Project)

Dr Opeyemi Kolawole
Dr Opeyemi Kolawole

Medical devices are integral to healthcare service delivery. Patients and healthcare service providers utilise these devices to diagnose, prevent, monitor, alleviate, and restore impaired body functions. Depending on the complexities of these devices and how they are deployed, they can become integrated with the patient’s body, and the patient’s healthy functioning and life may become dependent on the device (for example, an insulin pump or a pacemaker). Yet, like every other device, medical devices are susceptible to wear and tear: embedded software in the device may become obsolete over time, and physical elements may become deficient, making a device unsuitable for the patient’s needs. What options are available to the patient or health service provider in such instances? Should they, or a trusted repairer, be allowed to repair these devices? Patients and hospitals confronted this question at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Continue reading “A Right to Repair for Medical Devices?”

Nothing Without Us: Considering Public Patient Involvement in Research

Social Technologies

Author:  Joan Alaboson is a Doctoral Researcher in the Department of Psychology, Maynooth University. She has a background in medicine and an MSc in Public Health with broad research interests in non-communicable diseases, particularly mental health, social determinants of health and quality of life.

Joan Alaboson
Joan Alaboson

‘What can be done to make settling into the PhD, better?’ asked Dirk, the Director of the Science Foundation Ireland’s Centre for Research Training in Advance Networks for Sustainable Societies (ADVANCE CRT) at a meeting with funded PhD students. Being the only one in the room that had recently commenced my studies, at that moment I felt there was a deep sense of concern for my well-being by ‘management’. It was the first of such fora I’d attended, and I left with a lasting impression of being in relatable company during my studies.

True inclusion, however, could often be elusive, despite best efforts. There is hardly any organization, entity or group that does not seek to represent the interests of those concerned. It may be expressed in a vision, mission, goals, or activities. Yet, many can be left out. Sometimes, it is a fault inherent in group development, when diverse people are not present to consciously bring unique perspectives to the fore. Similarly, it may result from work protocols or culture that fail to recognize and may neglect, systematically, the views and or needs of diverse people.

Continue reading “Nothing Without Us: Considering Public Patient Involvement in Research”

Let’s Get Digital – Tackling Digital Poverty for all in South Dublin

Social Technologies

Author: Neasa Boyle, PhD Researcher, Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University

Neasa Boyle
Neasa Boyle

It’s impossible to overlook how deeply technology has influenced daily life, employment, and education today. With its growing importance, education systems must adapt to ensure that students are prepared for the modern digital world and obtain the skills to navigate a technologically advanced society. However, such education streams have only been implemented in recent decades, limiting social inclusion for individuals who are out of education, training, or employment. This new demand for digital skills leaves a large proportion of the population with the responsibility of upskilling, or else facing the risk of being left behind in the current job market and, ultimately, being left unable to participate in the society.

Continue reading “Let’s Get Digital – Tackling Digital Poverty for all in South Dublin”

Rapid Neonatal and Maternal Sepsis Detection in Resource Limited Environments

Social Technologies 

Authors: Nicola Mountford, Assistant Professor, School of Business, Assisting Living and Learning Institute (ALL), Maynooth University and Sean Doyle, Professor, Department of Biology, Maynooth University 

From Left to Right Neosepsis project logo, Sean Doyle, Nicola Mountford
Neosepsis project logo, Sean Doyle, Nicola Mountford 

Over 32,000 neonatal deaths occur per annum in Uganda, with sepsis accounting for 20% of this death rate – that’s 6,500 newborn babies who die of sepsis in just one country in the world. That’s not all, sepsis also accounts for almost a quarter of maternal deaths in Uganda. Our project, NEOSEPSIS, aims to reduce these numbers by introducing an easy-to-use, 15 minute lateral flow test to help to better diagnose sepsis in resource limited environments, such as Uganda.

The test detects Serum amyloid A, or SAA – a globally validated biomarker of sepsis. The lateral flow test used in this process is very similar to the type of antigen test that you might have used to help diagnose whether or not you had Covid-19. It is just as user-friendly, rapid, and equipment-free as one of those Covid antigen tests. This makes it particularly suited to environments where it might be difficult to take, store and transport samples.

Continue reading “Rapid Neonatal and Maternal Sepsis Detection in Resource Limited Environments”
Skip to content