Women & Girls in STEM: We Need a New Pipeline!

Social Lives

Authors: Dr Katriona O’Sullivan, Digital Skills Lecturer, ALL Institute, Maynooth University. Dr Serena Clarke, Post-Doctoral Researcher, ALL Institute, Maynooth University. Dr Holly Foley, Programme Manager, STEM Passport for Inclusion, ALL Institute Maynooth University.

Girls studying Science a group of girls studying science and using technology
Pictures from STEM Passport for Inclusion | Maynooth University Lab Days

 When thinking about women’s participation in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM), we often use the leaky pipeline as an analogy. There are specific places where women ‘leak’ out. For example, in school, young girls who show an early interest in science careers have often changed their minds by the time they reach secondary school due to a lack of STEM subjects and STEM supports being offered to them.  In college women who opt for STEM often change their minds before graduation. Those who do graduate with a STEM degree often leak out of the pipeline after graduation -opting for careers that are suitable to their family life. While others hit the glass ceiling when trying to progress into STEM leadership roles. In all cases, we see that women leak out of the STEM pipeline more than men do (Clark Blickenstaff, 2005). When considering the pipeline analogy, it is about time that we admitted as a society, especially on a day like today –International Women and Girl in STEM Day– that the STEM pipeline is well and truly broken– in fact, we need a whole new plumbing system… and we could probably do with a group of female scientists and engineers on hand to make sure it doesn’t break again.

Continue reading “Women & Girls in STEM: We Need a New Pipeline!”

The European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles: a proposed Guide for the Digital Transformation

Social Structures

Authors: Léa Urzel, PhD Researcher ERC Project DANCING, Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Law, Maynooth University and Matthew McKenna, PhD Researcher at Maynooth University’s ALL Institute, Research Funded through the Science Foundation of Ireland (SFI) Centre for Research Training in Advanced Networks for Sustainable Societies (ADVANCE CRT)

Léa Urzel (Left) and Matthew McKenna (Right) profile pictures with a black boarder
Léa Urzel & Matthew McKenna

Last Wednesday, 26 January 2022, the European Commission (the Commission) released a draft Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles for the Digital Decade (the Declaration) for the European Parliament and Council to discuss and eventually endorse. With this initiative, the Commission aims to provide a reference point for all involved in the European Union’s (EU) digital transformation and to guide policy makers as well as private actors working with new technologies.

Last week’s Declaration responds to calls from the Parliament to ensure strong consumer protection and the respect of fundamental rights and principles (e.g. non-discrimination, data protection, net neutrality) in approaching the EU’s digital transformation. It further builds on previous Council initiatives, including the Tallinn Declaration on eGovernment, the Berlin Declaration on Digital Society and Value-Based Digital Government, and the Lisbon Declaration – Digital Democracy with a Purpose. The draft Declaration also follows various Commission initiatives introduced in 2021 such as the Commission’s Communication on the Digital Compass: the European way for the Digital Decade presented last March. It sets out its ‘vision, targets and avenues for a successful digital transformation of Europe in 2030’. In addition, the Commission proposed in September 2021, the Path to the Digital Decade, a governance framework to deliver the Digital Decade’s targets.

Continue reading “The European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles: a proposed Guide for the Digital Transformation”

Election to the CRPD Committee: Some Insights from Behind the Scenes.

Social Structures

Author: Iryna Tekuchova, PhD Researcher, Department of Law, Maynooth University.

Iryna Tekuchova

“Being a human rights treaty body member is highly rewarding,” states the UN Handbook for Human Rights Treaty Body Members. It also mentions that the member of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (the Committee) is expected to have “high moral character” and “recognized competence and experience in the field”. However, this document is silent about the fact that beyond these qualities and merits, the candidates to the Committee often have to face a rocky electoral path, which turns to be difficult for many. Being an expert in a field covered by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (the CRPD) and having “high moral character” is not enough to have a real chance to be elected. 

In 2020, I had the unique opportunity to coordinate the election campaign of one of my former colleagues in the Ukrainian organization for people with disabilities “Fight For Right”, who stood as the Ukrainian candidate to the Committee in the seventh election cycle. Looking back at the nomination and election campaign paths, which we have done, I can identify some tendencies and systematic challenges of these processes relevant for the candidates and the countries. Even though each candidate’s experience is unique and varies from State to State, some points of concern, incidental for Ukraine, might resonate with other countries and, thus, be subject to further analyses. In this blogpost, I would like to highlight four issues that may directly or indirectly influence the efficiency of the whole election process to the Committee.

Continue reading “Election to the CRPD Committee: Some Insights from Behind the Scenes.”

Escaping Disciplinary Capture: Making our Health and Social Services Work Better

Social Structures

Authors: Kate Rochford, 3rd Year Undergraduate Intern, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University & Mac MacLachlan, Co-Director of the Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Maynooth University and Clinical Lead for Disability Services, Irish Health Service (HSE).

This figure illustrates the concept of disciplinary capture whereby one way of thinking (represented by one single text here) determines how people think about an issue. Like a whirlwind, it can often powerfully funnel thinking, ignoring the range of ideas available within the group, which otherwise may provide useful alternatives or additions to proposed actions. Image by Kate Rochford
This figure illustrates the concept of disciplinary capture whereby one way of thinking (represented by one single text here) determines how people think about an issue. Like a whirlwind, it can often powerfully funnel thinking, ignoring the range of ideas available within the group, which otherwise may provide useful alternatives or additions to proposed actions. Image by Kate Rochford

Introduction
An interdisciplinary approach to research has become increasingly popular when dealing with different topics (Aboelela et al., 2007). Such an approach can offer a more comprehensive or holistic perspective and is most suited to addressing real-world complex issues (Repko et al., 2017). However, while interdisciplinary collaboration may be appealing in theory, it is often difficult in practice (Cummings and Kiesler, 2007). In that regard, we believe that the concept of ‘disciplinary capture’ can supplement an enhanced interdisciplinary approach. It can also help to transpose academic thinking into practice. Particularly, in relation to disability, and services for persons with disabilities, this concept can translate into more effective integration of services.

Disciplinary capture involves thinking about problems from only one perspective (Brister, 2016). Disciplinary capture can determine what sort of ideas, facts, interventions or causal explanations, are depicted as permissible. For instance, a disease-model approach to mental health may only accept pharmaceutical interventions as being legitimate for a range of mental health problems, while a more psychological, social or human rights approach may not accept this (MacLachlan et al, 2021). In this scenario, if proponents of the disease model are positioned in such a way that other professions are expected to be deferential towards them, then this is likely to inhibit truly interdisciplinary practice. Moreover, this can impede the empirical merit of such a position through the preclusion of an open discussion which would allow for full exploration of all the possible alternatives. The result may manifest in poorer decision-making processes and sub-optimal interventions.

Continue reading “Escaping Disciplinary Capture: Making our Health and Social Services Work Better”

December 3rd 2021, Exploring this year’s theme to commemorate the International Day of Persons with Disabilities

Audio Version

December 3rd 2021, Exploring this year’s theme to commemorate the International Day of Persons with Disabilities. Author: Dr Ana María Sánchez Rodríguez, MSCA Fellow and Adjunct Assistant Professor of the Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute. Voiced by Anastasia Campbell

December 3rd, UN International Day of Persons with Disabilities – Celebrating the ‘12th European Union (EU) Access City Awards Ceremony’ for Human-Centred Urban Living and Ending ‘Disabling Cities’

Audio Version

December 3rd, UN International Day of Persons with Disabilities – Celebrating the ‘12th European Union (EU) Access City Awards Ceremony’ for Human-Centred Urban Living and Ending ‘Disabling Cities’. Author: Matthew McKenna, PhD Researcher at Maynooth University’s Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute , Research Funded through the Science Foundation of Ireland (SFI) Centre for Research Training in Advanced Networks for Sustainable Societies (ADVANCE CRT). Voiced by Anastasia Campbell

December 3rd 2021, UN International Day of Persons with Disabilities: Fighting for Rights in the Post – COVID Era

Audio Version

December 3rd 2021, UN International Day of Persons with Disabilities: Fighting for Rights in the Post – COVID Era. Author: James Cawley, Policy Officer, Independent Living Movement Ireland (ILMI). Voiced by Anastasia Campbell

Participation matters – Global Survey on involvement of persons with disabilities in public decision-making

Audio Version

Participation matters – Global Survey on involvement of persons with disabilities in public decision-making – Maynooth University. Author: Rebecca Daniel – PHD Student, Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University. Voiced by Anastasia Campbell

Skip to content